The functional explanation of relative clause extraposition in Persian

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Bu-Ali Sina University

Abstract

Relative clause extraposition is a structure in which a noun is modified by a non-adjacent relative clause, resulting in a discontinuous dependency. In this paper we try to find out why relative clause extraposition happens in Persian. There are two main functional explanations in the literature, called newness (Huck and Na 1990, 1992; Kuno and Takami 2004), and grammatical weight (Arnold et al 2000, 2004; Hawkins 1994, 2004; Wasow 1997; Yamashita and Chang 2001, Francis 2010). We have considered four different motivations which may affect relative clause extraposition: relative clause weight, main clause verb type, information status of verb and head of relative clause, and the definiteness of the head of the relative clause. The findings of this corpus based study reveal that these different factors do not play the same role in extraposing relative clauses in Persian. The main motivation is the relative length of relative clause and verb phrase. The long relative clauses tend to be extraposed more easily than the short ones. Information status and definiteness do not play a considerable role, while the verb type is also a determining factor. This paper emphasizes on the usefulness of functional explanations and it has some implications for word order typology of Persian.

Keywords


شیخ‌الاسلامی، افتخار (1387). نقش ساختار اطلاعاتی در خروج بندهای موصولی در زبان فارسی. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه کردستان.
غلامعلی‌زاده، خسرو (1374). ساخت زبان فارسی. تهران: احیاء کتاب.
لازار، ژیلبر (1384). دستور زبان فارسی معاصر. ترجمه مهستی بحرینی. تهران: هرمس.
 
Andrews, A.D. (2007). “Relative clauses”. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description: vol 2. Complex Constructions. Pp.206-236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arnold, Jennifer E., Thomas Wasow, Anthony Losongco & Ryan Ginstrom. (2000). “Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering”. Language 76 (1), 28–55.
Baltin, M. (2006). “Extraposition”. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol. 2, 237–271. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Culicover, Peter W. and Jackendoff, Ray S. (2005). Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dabir-Moghaddam, M. (2001). “Word Order Typology of Iranian Languages”. The Journal of Humanities 2 (8), 17 -23.
Dabir-Moghaddam, M. (2006). “Internal and external forces in typology: evidence from Iranian languages”. Journal of Universal Language 7, 29-47.
Darzi, Ali (1996). Word order, NP-movement, and Opacity Conditions in Persian. Unpublished doctoral Dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana.
Dryer, M. (1992). “The Greenbergian Word Order Correlations”. Language 68, 81-138.
Francis, E. J. (2010). “Grammatical weight and relative clause extraposition in English”. Cognitive Linguistics 21, 35-7.
Givón, T. (2001). Syntax: An Introduction, Vol.2, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Hawkins, J. A. (1994). A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency:Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hawkins, J. A. (2004). Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huck, Geoffrey J. and Younghee Na. (1990). “Extraposition and Focus”. Language 66 (1), 51-77.
Karimi, Simin (1989). Aspects of Persian syntax, specificity and the theory of grammar. Unpublished doctoral Dissertation. University of Washington.
Keenan, E. and Comrie, B. (1977). “Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar”.  Linguistic Inquiry, 8 (1), 63- 89.
Kroeger, R. P. (2005). Analyzing Grammar: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuno, S. & K. Takami. (2004). Functional Constraints in Grammar: On the Unergative-unaccusative Distinction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Marashi, Mehdi (1970). The Persian verb: A partial description for pedagogical purposes. Unpublished doctoral Dissertation. University of Texas, Austin.
Rochemont, M. S. & P. W. Culicover. (1990). English Focus Constructions and the Theory of Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. MIT dissertation.
Tabaian, Hessam (1974). Conjunction, relativization, and complementation in Persian. Unpublished doctoral Dissertation. University of Colorado.
Takami, Ken-ichi. (1999). “A functional constraint on Extraposition from NP”. In Akio Kamio & Ken-ichi Takami (eds.), Function and Structure, 23–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wasow, T. (1997). “End-weight from the speaker’s perspective”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 26(3). 347– 361.
Wasow, T. (2002). Postverbal Behavior. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Yamashita, Hiroko & Franklin Chang. (2001). “Long before short preference in the production of a head-final language”. Cognition 81. B45– B55.